Scoresheet: Correct "Innings Pitched" Representation

If you have an idea for improving the product, please post it here and we will try and prioritize updates based on the most popular requests.
Post Reply
User avatar
drmellow
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:48 am

Scoresheet: Correct "Innings Pitched" Representation

Post by drmellow » Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:08 am

I love this app, thanks for making a great one!

My enhancement request is to correct the representation of innings pitched on the PDF scoresheet. If a pitcher pitches for one out in an inning, the scoresheet reports it as ".33" instead of as ".1", two outs is represented as ".67" instead of ".2".

See, for example, the pitcher sheet for a game I scored last week: http://bit.ly/9NMOUO" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; where Chad James pitched for 4 innings and one out and was relieved by Bryan Evans, who pitched for 2 innings and 2 outs. James is credited with 4.33 innings and Evans is credited with 2.67. It should be 4.1 and 2.2 instead. These stats are correctly reported on the Admin Site with the box score -- the scoresheet is the only place where I've noticed it using true fractional math instead of number-of-outs math.

Thanks for considering this suggestion, and for a great app!

-greg

--
Greg Cohoon, Hoppers Fan
hoppersfan@gmail.com
http://hoppersfan.mlblogs.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://twitter.com/HoppersFan" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
FTMSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 13193
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: Scoresheet: Correct "Innings Pitched" Representation

Post by FTMSupport » Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:12 am

We will get this fixed on the scoresheet for a future update. Thank you.
Check out the new iScore Baseball documentation page!
Includes videos and user manual.
http://iscoresports.com/baseball/training.php#docs
User avatar
drmellow
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:48 am

Re: Scoresheet: Correct "Innings Pitched" Representation

Post by drmellow » Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:16 am

Excellent, thanks!

-g
Post Reply