WHIP and K/BB-ratio

We will try and answer Questions in this forum. If you are having any issues with iScore Baseball, this is probably the best place to start. You can also search historical posts here.
Post Reply
heidem
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:04 pm
Location: the Netherlands

WHIP and K/BB-ratio

Post by heidem » Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:47 am

Today I compared the stats of a game I scored with the official stats (I score the MLB games I watch on TV as a hobby). I noticed a difference in a pitcher's WHIP and K/BB-ratio. It seems that IBB is not included in the calculation of WHIP and the K/BB-ratio in iScore. Am I right? I've watched baseball games on TV since this season, so there's still a lot to learn for me regarding scoring, stats and so on.

Marc
heidem
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:04 pm
Location: the Netherlands

Re: WHIP and K/BB-ratio

Post by heidem » Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:53 pm

Today I noticed that there is something strange happening with the calculation of the batting average against.

Team A batting stats:
PA: 49
AB: 42
H: 15
BB: 6
HBP: 0
SAC: 1
AVG: 0.357 (= 15/42)

Team B pitching stats:
H: 15
BB: 5
IBB: 1
HB: 0
BAA: 0.349 (= 15/43)

According to the pitching stats, there was one AB more than according to the batting stats. Based on these numbers, I'd say that either the IBB or the SAC is included as an AB in the calculation of the BAA.

I've looked at the numbers of some recent games I scored. I believe the IBB's are included in the calculation of the BAA as AB's. The numbers of another game:

Team A batting stats
PA: 50
AB: 41
H: 17
BB: 8
HBP: 0
SAC: 1
AVG: 0.415 (= 17/41)

Team B pitching stats:
H: 17
BB: 6
IBB: 2
HB: 0
BAA: 0.395 (= 17/43)

According to the pitching stats, there were two AB's more than according to the batting stats. Based on these numbers, the only explanation can be that the IBB's are included as AB's in the calculation of the BAA.
User avatar
FTMSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 13193
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: WHIP and K/BB-ratio

Post by FTMSupport » Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:08 pm

We do not include Intentional Walks in the K/BB ratio --- this seems it would be correct as an intentional walk should not really be held against a pitcher in this scenario. That ratio is showing performance of a pitcher, and an intentional walk is a decision made by the team, not bad pitching by the pitcher.

The same would be true with WHIP --- you would not want to "ding" the pitcher for intentional walks as that is a team decision, not performance of the pitcher.

For BAA, we do see that we are not reducing the number of at bats by the intentional walks, and have made the adjustment to reduce the At Bats for that calculation by the number of Intentional walks. This update will be included in the next release.
Check out the new iScore Baseball documentation page!
Includes videos and user manual.
http://iscoresports.com/baseball/training.php#docs
User avatar
OhioTex
Posts: 5501
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 6:48 am
Location: Columbus OH

Re: WHIP and K/BB-ratio

Post by OhioTex » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:56 pm

nice catch heidem :!:
heidem
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:04 pm
Location: the Netherlands

Re: WHIP and K/BB-ratio

Post by heidem » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:26 am

FTMSupport wrote:We do not include Intentional Walks in the K/BB ratio --- this seems it would be correct as an intentional walk should not really be held against a pitcher in this scenario. That ratio is showing performance of a pitcher, and an intentional walk is a decision made by the team, not bad pitching by the pitcher.

The same would be true with WHIP --- you would not want to "ding" the pitcher for intentional walks as that is a team decision, not performance of the pitcher.
Thanks for the explanation!
OhioTex wrote:nice catch heidem :!:
Pure coincidence ;)
Post Reply