VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

We will announce new product updates here along with what features are being included in the updates
Post Reply
User avatar
OhioTex
Posts: 5501
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 6:48 am
Location: Columbus OH

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by OhioTex » Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:26 pm

If you missed it, posted else where on the forum (enhancement requests) is a first look at the new pitch chart (outstanding)

http://iscore.freeforums.org/download/file.php?id=15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false


"Hurry Up Apple ... I Want my 2.0"
User avatar
brentwalker
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Houston Area

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by brentwalker » Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:47 pm

Maybe if you posted the PRO version now, it might just beat the 2.0 version being released by Apple. I want the upgrade anyway.
calaberator
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:45 am

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by calaberator » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:31 pm

This is very frustrating. It sucks when you learn all about an app and just sit there and wait for a month without being able to learn any more of what the app does. What I like is a little teaser everyday of some new screenshots, more video's, etc. just to keep me from wanting to rip my hair out waiting for this app. I can't even score my games with this version (no offense to the developers who have gone through great lengths improving this app in record times) because my teams never give me the line ups before hand and they just pick the line up as there going up to bat. I am really going to love the new lineup feature! This will also save me 3 hours a week not having to make spreadsheets from our paper scorecards and post them on the site.

Great Job iScore!
tompanderson
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:48 am

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by tompanderson » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:50 am

Has 2.0 been rejected by Apple? 26 days and no approval seems like an unusually long time. I'm really hot to start scoring some MLB. Last time I had a powerful MLB scoring program that ran on a handheld was Fingertip for Stats on the Newton.

Tom
tompanderson
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:48 am

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by tompanderson » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:50 am

Has 2.0 been rejected by Apple? 26 days and no approval seems like an unusually long time. I'm really hot to start scoring some MLB. Last time I had a powerful MLB scoring program that ran on a handheld was Fingertip for Stats on the Newton.

Tom
User avatar
FTMSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 13193
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by FTMSupport » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:56 am

No rejections as of yet, and when we have emailed them asking what is causing the delay, we just get a form letter back saying "We've received your application inquiry. Each app submitted to Apple has different capabilities, features, and complexity, which means that individual review times vary. Once the application review process has been completed, you will receive an email notification."
mattbat
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 2:34 pm

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by mattbat » Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:34 pm

This is getting ridiculous... I bet no other approval has taken 26 days... Maybe iscore has too many great features...hahahaha :lol: :lol:
jdonato
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:15 am

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by jdonato » Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:47 pm

I read somewhere (last week) that some app was approved in six weeks. :roll:
I sure hope this will not be the case with iScore.
mattbat
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 2:34 pm

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by mattbat » Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:31 pm

wow
User avatar
FTMSupport
Site Admin
Posts: 13193
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: VERSION 2.0 SUBMITTED TO APPLE TODAY!

Post by FTMSupport » Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:37 pm

We have read of stories like that too... unfortunately they seem to be becoming more common. This is the first time we have been effected to this extreme.

They actually sent us some questions today about our use of a 3.0 feature... we made the application work with both the 2.x and 3.0 operating system, and only enabled the 3.0 feature if you are running on a 3.0 device. We don't want to have to force users to upgrade to 3.0 for this release. We explained what we did and are awaiting a response from them. Hopefully it means we are nearing approval.
Post Reply