It appears that the player scorecard as displayed on an iscore website(I need to confirm in the app, also) does not count successful bunts as hits in the stats shown on the card.
The stat lines are correct in the statistics tab, just not showing on the plaer cards stats
Thanks!
Player card on iscore website does not count bunts
Re: Player card on iscore website does not count bunts
I am not seeing this. Need more specifics. Or email and example to support.
I have players who have successful bunts and they are credited correctly on stats and in scorecard and in player card on device and web site. I do not find a discrepancy
I have players who have successful bunts and they are credited correctly on stats and in scorecard and in player card on device and web site. I do not find a discrepancy
Re: Player card on iscore website does not count bunts
!'m sorry. I misspoke. It is not the player card, it the hit locations as shown on the team website.
The stat line on the hit chart doesn't show bunts at all, even though the actual bunt locations is shown.
Again, I'm sorry.
The stat line on the hit chart doesn't show bunts at all, even though the actual bunt locations is shown.
Again, I'm sorry.
Re: Player card on iscore website does not count bunts
no worry. that makes more sense.
I see that now, yes the hit charts does not have a table row for bunts and does not tabulate them on the hit location chart. (all the stat pages do)
not sure if that was omission by design or intent, by FTM, as they try to balance print real estate and information overload. i know the numbers were not suppose to be all inclusive on the hit charts, and somethings were intentionally omitted..
I see that now, yes the hit charts does not have a table row for bunts and does not tabulate them on the hit location chart. (all the stat pages do)
not sure if that was omission by design or intent, by FTM, as they try to balance print real estate and information overload. i know the numbers were not suppose to be all inclusive on the hit charts, and somethings were intentionally omitted..