Oh man, that makes my life 1,000 times easier! TOTALLY worth paying $10 for the new Universal Version (aaaaaargh) AND $20 for the MLB 2013 Roster Add-On.

It's more of a learning curve issue wherein I have used a paper scorecard in the past and I keep thinking of iScore as a paper analog, which isn't how it works to my knowledge.

And thanks for your support and fast responses.

BJ

I am intrigued by the dribs & drabs of info that have been coming out about the next version. Is it a new point release (i.e. 4.0)? And will the separate iPhone & iPad products become a single iOS product, like the Basketball scorekeeper? I'm thinking about getting an iPad, and the prospect of buyin...

I'm right there with the other 2 folks who posted they wanted that. I would like that as well, just so I can keep score anywhere I go and I take my MacBook Pro with me, instead of just relying on my iPhone.

BJ

With the advent of the Mac App Store, I would enjoy and welcome a Mac App Store version of ESPN iScore Baseball Scorekeeper!

BJ

OhioTex wrote: What 'qualities' specifically ?

Specifically, the universal iPhone/iPad version.

Seriously, it annoys me no end that these app developers put out specific iPad versions when it could possibly be easier to just charge some extra money for new items (rosters, etc.) in in-app purchases.

BJ

Wow, that's incredible. Now can iScore Baseball have the same qualities please? Thanks guys!

BJ

I have been catching up on my podcasts, and one of the shows I watch, iPad Today, a show on the TWiT network (basically the replacement for the dearly departed TechTV channel), featured baseball apps on their 15th episode, and the hosts both looked at iScore, and Sarah Lane, the co-host, talked abou...

Congrats on the ESPN collaboration, FTM! I do have a question about what this means, however: Will the ESPN collaboration void our MLB Rosters add on, whether it is for 2009 or 2010, or will the collaboration enhance the rosters add on (and fix the issues with not seeing the entire roster that I've ...

Whoa, bizarre play.

I'd probably score that as just an attributed error to the catcher, and basically say no actual "sac bunt" but an attempted sac bunt because the catcher made an error in throwing to first, therefore the batter went to 2nd.

BJ